Voluntary Disclosure and Personalized Pricing

Research Seminars

A concern central to the economics of privacy is that firms may use consumer data to price discriminate. A common response is that consumers should have control over their data and the ability to choose how firms access it. Since firms draw inferences based on both the data seen as well as the consumer’s disclosure choices, the strategic implications of this proposal are unclear. The authors of the paper presented in the MaCCI/EPoS Virtual IO Seminar investigate whether such measures improve consumer welfare in monopolistic and competitive environments. They find that consumer control can guarantee gains for every consumer type relative to both perfect price discrimination and no personalized pricing. This result is driven by two ideas. First, consumers can use disclosure to amplify competition between firms. Second, consumers can share information that induces a seller — even a monopolist — to make price concessions. Furthermore, whether consumer control improves consumer surplus depends on both the technology of disclosure and the competitiveness of the marketplace. In a competitive market, simple disclosure technologies such as “track / do-not-track” suffice for guaranteeing gains in consumer welfare. However, in a monopolistic market,welfare gains require richer forms of disclosure technology whereby consumers can decide how much information they would like to convey.


Prof. Nageeb Ali Ph.D.

Nageeb Ali // The Pennsylvania State University, State College, USA

To the profile