I investigate if, how, and why the effect of a contribution rule in a public goods game depends on how it is implemented: endogenously chosen or externally imposed. The rule prescribes full contributions to the public good backed by a nondeterrent sanction for those who do not comply. My experimental design allows me to disentangle to what extent the effect of the contribution rule under democracy is driven by self-selection of treatments, information transmitted via the outcome of the referendum, and democracy per se. In case treatments are endogenously chosen via a democratic decision-making process, the contribution rule significantly increases contributions to the public good. However, democratic participation does not affect participants’ contribution behavior directly, after controlling for self-selection of treatments and the information transmitted by voting.

Gallier, Carlo (2017), Democracy and Compliance in Public Goods Games, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 17-038, Mannheim. Download

Autoren

Gallier, Carlo

Schlagworte

Laboratory experiment, public good, democracy, endogenous institutions, voting, contribution rule, compliance