Two computable general equilibrium models, one global and the other providing U.S. regional detail, are applied to analysis of the future of U.S. natural gas. The focus is on uncertainties including the scale and cost of gas resources, the costs of competing technologies, the pattern of greenhouse gas mitigation, and the evolution of global natural gas markets. Results show that the outlook for gas over the next several decades is very favorable. In electric generation, given the unproven and relatively high cost of other low-carbon generation alternatives, gas is likely the preferred alternative to coal. A broad GHG pricing policy would increase gas use in generation but reduce use in other sectors, on balance increasing its role from present levels. The shale gas resource is a major contributor to this optimistic view of the future of gas. Gas can be an effective bridge to a lower emissions future, but investment in the development of still lower CO2 technologies remains an important priority. International gas resources may well prove to be less costly than those in the U.S., except for the lowest-cost domestic shale resources, and the emergence of an integrated global gas market could result in significant U.S. gas imports.

Paltsev, Sergey, Henry Jacoby, John Reilly, Qudsia Ejaz, Jennifer Morris, Francis O´Sullivan, Sebastian Rausch, Niven Winchester and Oghenerume Kragha (2011), The future of U.S. natural gas production, use, and trade, Energy Policy 39(9), 5309-5321. Download


Paltsev, Sergey
Jacoby, Henry
Reilly, John
Ejaz, Qudsia
Morris, Jennifer
O´Sullivan, Francis
Rausch, Sebastian
Winchester, Niven
Kragha, Oghenerume


Natural gas, Climate policy, International gas trade